|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
981
   |
Posted - 2014.12.08 04:30:25 -
[1] - Quote
Reserved
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
981
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 04:30:34 -
[2] - Quote
reserved
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
981
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 04:31:20 -
[3] - Quote
reserved
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:19:38 -
[4] - Quote
Midori Tsu wrote:One of my main concerns is ship balance, and i'd like to learn more about your thoughts on it. As someone who flies T3s in a routine fashion, I'd like to hear you would balance T3s. I'd also like to know how you believe Ishtars are overpowered, do you think that sentries should be looked at as well?
T3s as they stand are better than BS , HAC , Command Ships they dominate fights as they do most thing very well all at once. I am not a game designer but it feels like they do too much well at once. Tank , Speed , Sig , DPS & DPS Application. Please point to a HAC , BS , BC hull that can do all of the above other than the Ishtar. I am not quite sure what to do with the Ishtar either but its still pretty op. I think maybe reducing the dronebay size is the answer.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:23:23 -
[5] - Quote
Yonis Pserad wrote:This is a great campaign, and I'm sure you'll get my vote.
Out of curiosity why do you believe shield is under powered compared to armor when most major doctrines (Tengus and Ishtars) seem to be mainly shield? Is that due to the bomb driven meta or because of another shortcoming that's not coming to mind?
Pretty much. The ishtar and Tengu still have lower sig because of the hull size and they are extremely kitey making bombing them much harder. The bomb meta is cancer on fleet tactics. You don't see Alpha Fleet you don't see Missile boats like ravens or navy scorps. The high sig of shield comps makes them a instant non starter.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:26:22 -
[6] - Quote
Gilbaron wrote:why do you prefer an occupancy based sov over a freeform sov approach ?
do you really want to see defensive mining fleets ?
I think Occupancy based is great and will allow so many different approaches to conquest and defense. Why would there be defensive mining fleets? I am gonna take a stab and say you are saying defensive mining ops would be utilized to maintain indexes for occupancy based sov. Yeah I don't think anyone wants mandatory and tedious mining fleets.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:30:18 -
[7] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:What is your view on competitive pvp in eve? (AT, Neo, some kind of dojo)
Where do you see Eve in a year, regarding competitive gameplay.
I love the alliance tourney. I would like to see more tourneys I participated in the past AT on the PL team on my alt Paik ( the Eos that lived in structure ). Unfortunately the problem with Eve is its kinda niche and im not sure its viable for E-sports. I wish it was. I don't really have a answer but i'll be listening for the guy/girl who does have the answer.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:31:05 -
[8] - Quote
marshmallow madness wrote:What is your favorite children's toy to step on in the middle of the night while walking through a hallway?
Stuffed Animals of course.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1000
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 09:44:32 -
[9] - Quote
BadAssMcKill wrote:How do you balance the learning experience for new players whilst also teaching them that Eve is a rough place and they shouldn't particularly expect it to be fair
I think in regards to new players that perhaps a week or so in a noobie friendly area would be great. Completely insulated from the rest of Eve. Most games have a noobie area which is focused on helping new players learn about the actual game and its mechanics. Once they have the time to learn this push them out of the nest. New players should be able to opt out sooner if they want. New player retention is one of the biggest hurdles for CCP.
BadAssMcKill wrote:What would you do to make it so that n+1 isn't the easiest way to win fleet fights
With the changes to power projection and further changes with sov you will start to see fights become more localized with less outsiders intervening. Numbers will always be a huge factor in fights and there is no way that I know of to change that.
BadAssMcKill wrote:E: How would your sov system work wrt to timers and sov structures. What would you do to actually encourage people to live in sov null.
So to be clear I don't have the smoking gun answer. But what I do have is a ton of knowledge and experience in this game. I plan to use that to help CCP develop or find the possible smoking gun. But in regards to why would people want to live in Nullsec? Risk vs Reward and Carrots should be the driving principles. You can't force players to do anything however you can incentivize the thing you want them to do and not make it painful and they will do it.
BadAssMcKill wrote:Do you have any ideas on NPC null and lowsec (That isn't FW.) What would you do to encourage pvp in hisec , and possibly make it a viable home for people in the long term. Yea I think there have been a bunch of good ideas on NPC Nullsec. The ones I like alot is that inhabitants that do things for the faction get added benefits similar to some of the benefits you get from holding sov. Hisec PVP I am not really sure I think people that aren't interested in PVP mainly reside in Hisec. So honestly I would just listen for good ideas for this area.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1013
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 21:57:17 -
[10] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger. Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization? He has three answers. 1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same. 2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians. 3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here. Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works. EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.
First - I am not the leader of Pandemic Legion.
Secondly - Pandemic Legion has all kinds of players engaging in all kinds of gameplay. Just because a guy solo's in lowsec and is really good doesn't automatically mean the rest of us are as well.
Third - I personally don't engage in scamming I would have to much guilt for it personally.
Fourth - Scamming is legal in Eve as well as stealing despite how distasteful some people find it. I am of the opinion that I like the diversity of gameplay in Eve. Eve is a terrible cold and evil place and that makes it feel so much more exciting.
So I am sure this isn't going to satisfy you. I am not a politician , I am just a guy that sincerely loves the game and the community and has alot of passion about it. If I don't get your vote then welp sorry.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
|
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1027
|
Posted - 2014.12.11 03:28:07 -
[11] - Quote
Thanks for all the support and replies. If anyone has any has any questions im happy to answer them.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1033
|
Posted - 2014.12.15 13:08:02 -
[12] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Manfred Sideous wrote:Thanks for all the support and replies. If anyone has any has any questions im happy to answer them. Asked a couple questions a couple pages back but I think they were lost in the post attributing other players actions to you. So I will just ask again. What would you change about T3's and Ishtars? Do you think the rise in OPness of T3's and Ishtars is attributable to the fact that BC's (natural Cruiser hunters) are essentially garbage currently? What are your thoughts on BC's and BS's? I remember back in 09/10 there was a nice little food chain. HACS/T3 > BS > BC > HACS/T3. IMO It seems that food chain is dead these days.
T3's and Ishtar's - I was having this discussion with some wormhole people the other day. It feels like the Tengu is the biggest violator currently. If anything the Loki might need slight tweeks. Ishtars I think reduce the drone bay to 200m3. They can carry 1 set sentries 1 medium 1 small set of drones.
The problem with Nullsec PVP is bombers. They are still completely ******** and coupled with how easy probing is now the GODBOMB run is a actual thing and threat at all times. They severely restrict fleet concepts in nullsec. When my opponent brings Dominix's I'd love to bring Alphafleet but doing so is suicide due to bombers.
Yeah BC,BS & Hacs are way outside the meta especially in Nullsec. Most times its just better to bring a T1 cruiser than a Hac. BC's are so woefully inept next to T3's. Command ships aren't in much better shape and most BS are laughable at best in nullsec.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1033
|
Posted - 2014.12.15 13:24:29 -
[13] - Quote
Pike Chargrim wrote:Ditto for me: Pike Chargrim wrote:In your opinion:
1) what is currently broken about lowsec?
2) how would you fix it?
3) how do you see low-sec fitting into the universe as a whole going forward?
Your post mentions something about FW, but there is more to lowsec than FW.
The problem with lowsec is simple. There is no meaningful reason to be there other than PVP. It offers no unique features or advantages. Think about it with me what do the other areas have that are unique.
Hisec - Safety
Nullsec - Sov ownership , Supercapital production
Wormholes - Sleepers , Semi-Isolationism
Lowsec- Hmmm something should go here. I mean I guess FW but thats basically sov war with training wheels.
What I would change is:
Lowsec should be the premier industrial area of Eve. It should have the best and most efficient factory lines available in Eve. Players should be able to contract protection from Factions. Basically put in a system where players can purchase standings to FW by purchasing a 30 day certificate from the faction of their choosing. The isk then gets divided amongst FW members every month. Furthermore when factory lines are utilized it unlocks benefits for that faction.
So basically you end up with a system where lowsec is busy with builders and industrialist. Faction Warfare members now have meaningful reasons to patrol and protect their factions space. They have reason in which to raid opposing factions and reasons for conquest of opposing factions space. Because whoever is providing stable and safe areas will get more business. Furthermore with increased traffic and population it gives more reasons for piracy to exist.
I see lowsec as basically empire space and the factions are basically Mafia families. They extort money for protection services from people wanting to engage in industry in lowsec. But the hook has to be that doing production is so much cheaper and efficient in lowsec versus hisec that it draws builders there.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1033
|
Posted - 2014.12.15 13:33:20 -
[14] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Thank you for your earlier response.
What is your position on fighter assignment? For example a Nyx assigns fighters from the edge of a POS to a T1 frigate which is somewhere else in the system.
with kind regards
l0rd carlos
A few things. Fighter assignment is kinda dumb because the carrier/supercarrier pilots drone skills are meaningless. This needs to be addressed. Secondly its a very contentious subject as lone carriers and supercarriers are easy to kill with bumps. So making them sit to far away from pos shields means instant death should someone land on grid and call in friends. However it is frustrating to have a capital slink back into the shields whenever someone tries to stop them assigning fighters. Furthermore you see pilots using sticks to assign fighters from. A stick is a online tower that has not had the forcefield turned on . The forcefield can be turned on instantly if the capitals are in any danger. Honestly I don't have the answer but I understand the problem from all sides and its permutations . If I had to stab in the dark I think capitals need to be somewhere between 5000-7500 meters minimum from the Forcefield to assign fighters. Thats a stab in the dark though if CCP were actually willing to look at the issue id wanna talk more with the community to look for better ideas.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1034
|
Posted - 2014.12.16 12:48:25 -
[15] - Quote
Hiasa Kite wrote:Whenever you're fighting in Catch, you might be able to zoom in at a ship and see me leaning out a window, shaking g my fist at you. For the CSM however, you'll be getting my vote.
+1 my dear frenemy.
Thanks for the support.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1035
|
Posted - 2014.12.22 17:46:14 -
[16] - Quote
Thanks for all the support. Please feel free to post any questions.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1036
|
Posted - 2014.12.24 21:56:16 -
[17] - Quote
Merry Christmas Eve.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1037
|
Posted - 2014.12.27 15:57:33 -
[18] - Quote
Leyla Celeste wrote:Best of luck Manny. Do better than I did!(which isn't hard haha)
Thanks for the Upswags
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1037
|
Posted - 2014.12.29 16:09:15 -
[19] - Quote
Inggroth wrote:Easily top 3 on my list. Good luck Manny, p sure you'll get enough backing though. My question: Any ideas on how to pull (non-tier3) battlecruisers out of the dumpster balance-wise? Just leaving these two here, because i think they're maybe worth a look Prom has an idea which i think has some merit, where you'd rebalance MJD functionality to be a script for regular MWD, only loadable if you're in a ship type that can use MJD. So BCs would not have to use an extra slot and fitting resources to get MJD functionality. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5345740
When the whole "nerf offgrid links" was a thing i've had this idea where link modules would apply to the ship they're fitted to regardless of its fleet position or if its in fleet at all - so there would be an incentive to do BCs with links, at least in really small gangs and solo. (now obviously as long as everyone who cares the least bit about ~1337 pvp~ has a link alt this wouldnt change much) https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4064502#post4064502
Those changes dont do much for larger-scale engagements, but then again BCs havent been a thing in fleets since the Drake Era
The problem is T3's are better than everything in the current meta so looking at BC's and lol Command Ships is pointless. Because when CCP nerfed nanos years ago they made it so Signature Radius was everything.
Bombers are the problem to Tier 3 BCs and most sniper platforms. Well in fact pretty much every concept is plagued by bombers. What CCP fails to understand is that a few things way out of balance cast ripples through the rest of the game.
Combat Probing - It is so hilariously easy. Anyone with the most basic skills can probe and get a warp to 0 result on a hostile fleet every 10 seconds. This automatically hampers fleet tactics.
Bombers - The literal cancer of nullsec PVP. Cripples doctrine choices.
TL ; DR - The word Battle does not belong in Battlecruiser in its current form its more like LOLGETHAZEDNERDCRUISER&GETAREALSHIP
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1040
|
Posted - 2015.01.04 17:08:20 -
[20] - Quote
Jaysen Larrisen wrote:Manny, I've been impressed by your thread and responses so far...you are on my short list for CSM definitely. One of the things that i like about your platform is to get into the nitty gritty of flying and balancing combat for not just big fleets but small gang / solo as well. Few questions for you... 1) I'm curious about your thoughts on the upcoming Recon balance that CCP Rise has put on the table for Proteus. Lot of debate back and forth on d-san immunity, T2 resists for Recons, and frankly the role of the ships (i.e. stealthy recon vs electronic warfare platform...hard to do both). 2) What can we do to get Battleships more interesting to fly? They are the face of PVE but fall behind dramatically at PVP. As a side note it would be kinda nice to actually intentionally undock a Raven for PVP instead of just shooting red crosses.  3) I noticed you specifically mentioned missiles as something that needed some work to make them more viable in PVP work. I tend to run missiles and drones pretty exclusively and you are spot on. What would you propose to CCP and the community to make the missile weapons family more competitive? 4) How will you reach out to other facets of the community outside the Big Fleet scene? Hopping in NPSI roams, blogging, etc? Thanks for your time - look forward to seeing your responses. Cheers!
Thanks first for the suppot.
In regards to Recons I see them serving 2 separate purposes. Cloaking recons are well covert and by nature should be more focused on hit & run and things of that nature. Whereas the combat recons would be amazing if they were beefier and able to be a part of main fleets on the front line applying superior ewar power. As it is they are super flimsy and you see people using T3's. If I were the one balancing them the Lachesis would have low DPS high tank/buffer potential. Whereas the Arazu would have higher DPS and lower tank but they both would enjoy the same Ewar bonus. As far as not showing up on the scanner I can see this being a decent bonus for the stealth recon.
Battleships are easy to tackle. You fix 3 things. One combat probing needs to be changed. Two bombing needs to be changed. Three Missiles need to be immune to firewall but in exchange there needs to be counterplay to missiles. Perhaps a midslot item that launches chaff that disrupts the accuracy of missiles.
I plan to be very communicative once on the CSM with post on the Eve-Forums and other fan sites. I've been known to participate in several podcast and radio shows as well as interviews this will continue to be true.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
|
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1041
|
Posted - 2015.01.10 16:19:09 -
[21] - Quote
Jaysen Larrisen wrote:Thanks for the response.
I like your idea on the Combat Recon...survivability in stead of pure DPS and they can preform admirably. I'm admittedly a bit concerned my Rook will still be overshadowed by he T1 Blackbird, Falcon, and T3s.
At this point, just about anything that can help missile systems will be welcome and you idea of counters to them could be pretty nifty
Again, thanks for answering and good luck in the election.
Appreciate the support.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1042
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 19:41:55 -
[22] - Quote
Thanks for all the support.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1042
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 05:45:05 -
[23] - Quote
Dave Korhal wrote:Speaking of Catch, what problems/issues with large-scale sov combat and older vs younger alliances do you think the recent HERO/PL fights highlighted?
Nothing the character bazaar and some recruitment couldn't fix.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1045
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 22:06:52 -
[24] - Quote
Thanks for all the great support!
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1045
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 22:34:24 -
[25] - Quote
Angry RedGummyBear wrote:Several good candidates this year I've got my eye on. Any updates to that hope of making regions/clusters of regions more self sufficient (in terms of resource availibility) for null? Or do you see the upgrades to wormholes as a viable replacement to the JF's of old as a tether to Jita? I only ask because that seems to be the normal means of moving goods to and from hi-sec now.
As a relatively new (1 year) player, its kind of annoything that everytime I try and help the alliance/coalition I'm in with industry/invention/production, the answer is always "It's just easier to import it, if you want to help, train T2 haulers". Especially considering I'd like to be able to fund my roaming addiction with industry skills (PI/ Reasearch/ manufacturing) rather than ratting or mining.
I don't think Jita is or should be the answer for Nullsec. I think local industry and production as a means of supply is much better. Think about it if you will. A few nullsec guys running back and forth to Jita doesn't offer much in the way of meaningful gameplay. However sourcing and producing locally would have many more people in space doing things. Those activities are buds for conflict drivers. Reasons for people to come and raid those people or interfere with their activities. Which gives meaningful reasons for defense & patrol fleets. If it were my call Id nuke the JF and give it the same fatigue and cooldown as other caps Gäó.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1047
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 10:57:28 -
[26] - Quote
Ranamar wrote:Ranamar wrote:Manfred Sideous wrote:Dave Korhal wrote:Speaking of Catch, what problems/issues with large-scale sov combat and older vs younger alliances do you think the recent HERO/PL fights highlighted? Nothing the character bazaar and some recruitment couldn't fix. Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly, it sounds like you're saying that what HERO needs is basically 10 trillion ISK to buy a supercapital fleet and pilots for it? (I'm figuring that would buy you 1-200 supercapitals, distributed somehow between titans and supercarriers, and alts to fly them.) I'm not trying to belittle this, I'm just trying to confirm if you're basically saying that asset and skill point disparities are the main things that were highlighted, and that those are pretty fixable. I'm still interested in whether this is what you were trying to say.
What I am saying is. HERO can recruit players with the ships and skillpoints. HERO can purchase chars from the bazaar and the ships. I dig HERO I think they are absolutely cool. However if you CHOOSE to be newbie centric then you automatically place yourself at a disadvantage skillpoint and asset wise. However there are devices in which to circumvent the situation. But asking for the game to be balanced around the style HERO CHOSE is not realistic. Eve is a cold dark and unfair universe. The path you choose to go has its benefits and cost. Having a gazillion newbies gives you a great zerg force and thats a huge benefit. But numbers should ALWAYS have some counter otherwise he who blobs the hardest wins. AKA NC 1.0 and CFC.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1049
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 23:33:01 -
[27] - Quote
New Interview http://capstable.net/2015/02/06/manfred-sideous/ have a listen.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1055
|
Posted - 2015.02.10 20:36:57 -
[28] - Quote
Angry RedGummyBear wrote:Manfred Sideous wrote:
I don't think Jita is or should be the answer for Nullsec. I think local industry and production as a means of supply is much better. Think about it if you will. A few nullsec guys running back and forth to Jita doesn't offer much in the way of meaningful gameplay. However sourcing and producing locally would have many more people in space doing things. Those activities are buds for conflict drivers. Reasons for people to come and raid those people or interfere with their activities. Which gives meaningful reasons for defense & patrol fleets. If it were my call Id nuke the JF and give it the same fatigue and cooldown as other caps Gäó.
Dear God. Can I vote for you 14 times?
Thanks for the support it is appreciated.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.14 09:53:35 -
[29] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:
Have you any ideas/opinions on how supercaps can stop being the cancer of Eve?
Its going to depend how sov 3.0 shakes out. Changing them before that wouldn't make sense. The supercarriers role has been to be the ultimate structure grinder. The titan the ultimate expression of damage. So that's what these ships have been defined as thus far. If I were to take a stab in the dark however. The supercarrier I am not sure at this time what to do. I think giving the titan a bigger sma would be great for the shipclass. Scriptable DDD's have been talked about for years. Really its hard to give a good answer here without knowing how sov and other changes are. Hopefully with your vote ill be able to get in take a look and really start to start having that conversation with the Community and CCP.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.14 23:30:09 -
[30] - Quote
Thanks for the support keep the questions coming.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
|
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 07:33:34 -
[31] - Quote
Thanks for this really nice and cool of you to make this. Appreciate the support.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 22:06:53 -
[32] - Quote
Pallidum Treponema wrote:I've flown with Manny in many roles over the past several years. He's opinionated, stubborn and strong minded. I've had more than a few arguments with him, where we haven't seen eye to eye. He's also someone who has the best interests of the game in mind, and who will not hesitate to voice his opinion to that effect.
I fully trust Manny to be an excellent addition to the CSM, and he's got my full support.
Thanks for the support Palli
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 22:10:50 -
[33] - Quote
In the latest capstable candidate review I notice that one of the remarks was I wasn't very polished. I am not a politician I would rather people vote for me based off of who I am and what I have communicated not how I communicated. I am not interested in kissing the voters ass to get them to vote for me. I will however try to win you over through superior ideas my knowledge of the game and my experience.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1057
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 21:46:28 -
[34] - Quote
New Crossing Zebras podcast with Endie and I. Have a listen: http://crossingzebras.com/crossing-zebras-episode-53/
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1059
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 20:27:36 -
[35] - Quote
Just posting to say why arent others posting?
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1059
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 21:05:59 -
[36] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:What's to say - put Manny in your voting preferences.
And your heart!
Thanks Malcalypse for all the support
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1066
|
Posted - 2015.02.23 06:02:16 -
[37] - Quote
Appreciate the support and endorsement will do my best to live up to it.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1067
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 18:35:51 -
[38] - Quote
Slevin-Kelevra wrote:Looking at you as a candidate, I see you have been involved in a lot, great. However it seems you have been very inactive for a while now? Do you think that past experience makes up for inactivity now? Why should I vote for someone who is not very active?
I'm inactive? I just lead a campaign against Solar , Black Legion and Triumvirate. I FC'd fleets as little as 2 days ago.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1067
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 18:54:08 -
[39] - Quote
Thanks for the support and the votes!
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1072
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 20:16:12 -
[40] - Quote
Thanks for all the great support so far.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
|
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1097
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 22:53:15 -
[41] - Quote
http://crossingzebras.com/crossing-zebras-episode-55/
New podcast with Endie over at Crossing Zebras where we talk Fozziesov.
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1107
|
Posted - 2015.03.12 06:26:52 -
[42] - Quote
Thanks for all the support and votesGÖÑ
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
Manfred Sideous
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
1109
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 17:39:56 -
[43] - Quote
Ty everyone for believing! Humbled beyond words GÖÑ Manny
@EveManny
https://twitter.com/EveManny
|
|
|
| |
|